Propositions 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 deserve a 'Yes' vote

2009-10-27 / Editorial

Offering recommendations on state constitutional amendments can be difficult; sometimes just understanding the ballot language is a challenge.

After having studied analyses by several nonpartisan groups, the Dispatch Record suggests a strong "Yes" vote on the following propositions for the Nov. 3 Constitutional Amendments Special Election. (Early voting is available through Friday at the elections administrator office, 412 S. Live Oak in Lampasas.)

Proposition 2: This would allow a homestead to be appraised for tax purposes at its residential value rather than a commercial or "highest and best use" standard. This is an important homeowner protection.

Proposition 3: The proposed constitutional amendment provides for uniform standards in property appraisals and would reduce the potential for manipulation of values. Equal treatment under the law is a fundamental right.

Proposition 5: The proposal would permit consolidation of appraisal review boards for adjoining districts. Particularly in rural counties with small populations where it may be difficult to find qualified persons to serve on appraisal review boards, this ability to consolidate would be useful and more efficient.

Proposition 7: This amendment would allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard to hold a political office. From the time of the Founding Fathers, state elected officials have been allowed to serve in state militias. This oversight in the Texas Constitution should be corrected.

Proposition 11: Perhaps the proposition that has garnered the most publicity, this amendment would put clear restrictions on the right of eminent domain. By narrowing the definition of "public use," private property protections are strengthened.

While Propositions 2,3,5,7 and 11 are strongly recommended as ones voters should ratify, a few others deserve a strong "No" vote by those who support private property rights and fiscal restraint.

Propositions 1 and 9 are viewed by many as an expansion of government power that would threaten private property rights, and Proposition 4 would increase government spending on research rather than student education. Research is best conducted in the private sector.

And although Lampasas County is not served by an emergency service district, these boards have the power to levy taxes and shouldn't receive extended terms, as Proposition 10 would allow.

Return to top